{"id":1480,"date":"2015-02-19T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-02-19T18:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thinkapps.com\/blog\/?p=1480"},"modified":"2015-03-10T11:48:20","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T19:48:20","slug":"chris-messina-life-after-google","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thinkapps.com\/blog\/entrepreneurship\/chris-messina-life-after-google\/","title":{"rendered":"Chris Messina: Life After Google (Part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is the first installment of our\u00a0two-part interview with Chris Messina, best-known as the man who invented the hashtag.<\/em><\/p>\n

Though he\u2019s worked at Google, launched several startups, and been a driving force behind open-source community building (with the likes of BarCamp<\/a> and coworking<\/a>), Chris Messina<\/a> is most frequently associated with that moment<\/a> in 2007 when he suggested that\u00a0IRC<\/a>\u2019s way of organizing channels with a pound sign would work beautifully in the Twitter landscape \u2014 yes, this is the man who brought us the hashtag.<\/p>\n

With a degree in communication design from Carnegie Mellon, Messina started out in graphic and web design but soon started working in development and user experience. After more than half a decade as a founder and consultant, he took a job at Google in 2010, working on an exciting, new social network.<\/p>\n

\u201cGoogle+ is such a perfect tragedy,\u201d Messina says of the product\u2019s anti-climactic trajectory. \u201cRather than building out a simpler, better, mobile-first vision of social networking in the future, Google+ focused on the recent past, chasing ghosts in its rearview mirror.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since his departure from Google in 2013, Messina has been a refreshingly honest voice in the industry; his blog on Medium<\/a> covers a wide range of issues, both professional<\/a> and personal<\/a>, but always viewed through the lens of a tech entrepreneur and styled with Messina\u2019s characteristic tongue-in-cheek voice.<\/p>\n

I recently had the opportunity to talk to Messina, and the interview produced so much interesting content that we\u2019ve decided to split the piece into two posts<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In Part One, we discuss life after Google, behavioral economics, predicting the future, and creating communities.<\/p>\n

\"Chris<\/a><\/p>\n

What are you working on now?<\/h2>\n

I wish I had a better answer for you, but frankly my biggest project over the last year and half has been myself.<\/p>\n

Since leaving Google, I\u2019ve done a lot of self-work and reflection. I\u2019ve traveled, learned to meditate, been to Burning Man twice, gotten divorced, entered into a new (non-monogamous) relationship, and become a bonus dad to my partner\u2019s two kids.<\/p>\n

Essentially, I\u2019ve grown up. I\u2019m more centered in myself, and my mind has opened up. You know, it\u2019s not always a popular thing to slow down, disengage, and survey the landscape, but I\u2019m much better for it.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m seeing new patterns of behavior and fissures of change that are worth investigating. It\u2019s hard to get to those insights when you stay in the froth; you\u2019ve got to step outside where you feel comfortable and shake things up.<\/p>\n

What has this outside perspective revealed?<\/h2>\n

A couple threads have started to stand out to me. From the impact of social technologies on long term and intimate relationships<\/a> (#BigDating) to using conversational mediums<\/a> (#ConvComm) like chat and text messaging for commerce, there are interesting products to be built where intimacy, relationships, communication, and commerce intersect.<\/p>\n

Digital nomads<\/a> (#DigitalNomads) are combining mobility, communications, coworking, and co-living in novel arrangements that present exciting design opportunities for urban planners and technologists.<\/p>\n

The enablers of this trend are only now becoming ubiquitous and cost-effective to make this lifestyle available for a broader set of people. We\u2019re watching the shape of work radically reconfigure.<\/p>\n

What was the most interesting aspect of life at Google?<\/h2>\n

I was fortunate to be there for the transition of power from Eric Schmidt back to Larry Page.<\/p>\n

When I joined the company, the web was the platform and you could throw things against the wall to see what stuck. After Larry took over, that all changed. Building a product to 85% completion wasn\u2019t sufficient; you had to invest for the long haul, make big bets.<\/p>\n

Think of Google\u2019s 10x moonshot mantra<\/a>. Essentially it became too expensive (considering employee management and brand loyalty) for Google to keep producing duds. With an increasingly competitive marketplace, technical merit wasn\u2019t sufficient to differentiate their products; Google needed to bring designers to the fore.<\/p>\n

Larry specifically brought about a much greater focus on design and aesthetics. Engineers were no longer solely responsible for the front-end UIs of their products. Google+ led a lot of this change, and Android has continued that trend with Material Design<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m not sure that Material could have happened under Schmidt, who reigned over a meritocratic adhocracy. Larry\u2019s Google is tighter, more vertical, and disciplined. He can dictate a more cohesive, controlled aesthetic.\u00a0As a result, Google\u2019s products have improved considerably over the last four years.<\/p>\n

Being there to witness this massive organizational transition was probably the most worthwhile and interesting aspect of my time there. It left me with loads of respect and insight into what makes Google different, and what separates it from other companies out there.<\/p>\n

Entrepreneurs are tasked with constantly predicting the future. How do you react to that kind of stress?<\/h2>\n

I\u2019ll admit that I suffer from lengthy periods of self-doubt peppered with moments of clairvoyance. The problem is, it\u2019s hard to know when my intuition is tapping into something general, versus specific to my experience.<\/p>\n

Most entrepreneurs that share ideas with me have some key insight about their intended audience (which may include themselves), but don\u2019t think about behavioral economics and bridging structures. That is, they don\u2019t think about how they\u2019ll seed adoption.<\/p>\n

In my experience, you\u2019re more likely to succeed if you align your product with a familiar behavior. This lowers the behavioral cost of the new thing so there\u2019s less resistance to it. Get this right and you can push forward with your bridging structure: taking your early adopters from that familiar place to wherever new it is you want them to go.<\/p>\n

Twitter is a great example of this if you consider their reliance on SMS early on. More recently, Slack pulled the same trick by freeing IRC from the bowels of the internet (which is where most developers have historically hung out) and bringing it to web browsers and mobile devices.<\/p>\n

Slack recreated IRC\u2019s fundamentals while introducing several product improvements, like embedding media inline and making it easy to invite new users. For developers familiar with IRC, Slack is completely intuitive \u2014 plus a better overall experience. Having built a bridge to their past, developers become the viral vector for taking over corporate America!<\/p>\n

You’ve had a lot of success fostering community, an enviable skill. Can you share your tactics?<\/h2>\n

I remember in the early days of BarCamp, there\u2019d be people who would email me and ask me to come organize a local event for them. Instead, I\u2019d open up Illustrator and make a BarCamp logo for them<\/a>, using colors from their state or country flag, send it back to them and say, \u201cHere\u2019s your logo, here\u2019s a link to the documentation<\/a>, you put on your event. You can do this.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here I was, some punk kid in Silicon Valley, giving them permission to not need to ask for permission! I was giving them the BarCamp brand and entrusting them with maintaining its integrity.<\/p>\n

With coworking, it was similar. We published everything we were doing openly, including our finances and how much money we were losing. We were interested in showing people what was really involved in running a space \u2014 putting the upside of community and connection in context with fiscal realities.<\/p>\n

We wanted everyone to not only have a stake in the collective\u2019s success, but also be owners and co-determinants of whether the thing lived on or not. The more we handed over control and treated our effort like an open-source project, the more people showed up, willing to pitch in and contribute.\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

How has your productivity style changed now that you’re not in a traditional office?<\/h2>\n

For a while I was funemployed \u2014 not really working at all. It was an enormous privilege to have time to step back from everything, learn meditation, spend time by myself, and reconnect with friends.<\/p>\n

Last fall, I started to think more seriously about what I wanted to do next, and I have to admit \u2014 it\u2019s been stop and go getting my groove back. I suppose I\u2019ve always been a bit driven by distraction, but working from home seems to amplify this tendency.<\/p>\n

While I was happy to leave the corporate office and my two-hour commute behind, there was utility in being surrounded by smart, focused, competitive people who always needed something from you or challenged you to work harder or more intentionally. I find that I still have this tendency to interact with people throughout my day \u2014 but now it\u2019s largely through social media.<\/p>\n

As I\u2019ve got speaking and travel gigs on the horizon, I expect by April to have figured out my next move, rebalancing my independent work with something more collaborative. I mean, I definitely enjoy my freedom, but a guy\u2019s gotta eat and pay the rent too!<\/p>\n

Part Two<\/h2>\n

Next week\u00a0we\u2019ll publish Part Two<\/a>, which will cover more industry-related topics like defining failure for a social network, the hashtag, innovating across cultural and privilege divides, and what privacy means in a time when we give away our precious digital reflections to social networks for free. Please stay tuned!<\/p>\n

\n
\n